As far as I know, the Italian court ruling was not a "study", and in fact heavily relied on the fraudulent 1998 Wakefield article as evidence.
Incidentally your artcile written by Emily Willingham does not cite a linked study.
Why would it? It was a news article about the Italian case. If you want evidence that vaccines don't cause autism, I already told you that there have been no scientific studies to date showing a causal link. The findings have been unanimous, and I've already linked to a document from the American Academy of Pediatrics with citations of over 40 studies showing no evidence of an autism/vaccine link. Here, I'll post it again if you didn't take the time to read it the first time:
Vaccine Safety: Examine the Evidence
Do you deny that there are individuals that have been adversely harmed by "safe" vaccines?
This seems to be the same trick that all of you anti-vaxer folks play. You make a wild assumption that has no evidence to back it up, such as "vaccines cause autism", then when presented with evidence to the contrary, you hide behind platitudes like "vaccines are not 100% safe every time and can have side effects", which no one denies.
The risks are well documented and researched, and autism isn't one of them.
How about the fact that your links do not even state what you claim they do?
Please provide evidence of this. I see no reason to believe you've read any of my links at all, seeing as how you missed the link to the actual study in the press release.
Here, I'll link to the full study again since you can't seem keep up:
The entire study is there, with full references and even a couple of graphs. This is the same document I linked to in post #120.
Please try to pay attention.