Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew; hoosierham; ConservingFreedom; All

The problem is that they apparently in many cases have not been returning items even without arrest. The Cato Inst. link explains the with Civil rather than Criminal Forfeiture, non only what a person is carrying, but even homes and vehicles can be seized and NEVER returned even with NO conviction. The ACLU link documents a successful case against unfair and abusive enforcement.

http://www.cato.org/events/policing-profit-abuse-civil-asset-forfeiture

https://www.aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform-racial-justice/settlement-means-no-more-highway-robbery-tenaha-texas


56 posted on 03/21/2015 12:54:57 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin

Again without probable cause of a crime, a government search or seizure is “unreasonable” and violates the 4th Amendment, so a “civil” seizure by the government (no crime involved) is per-se illegal and unconstitutional.

People need to learn the Constitution and start standing up for their rights. Good for New Mexico. To reestablish freedom and the Constitution as the supreme law of the land, states need to start nullifying unconstitutional federal acts.

If the injustice is being perpetrated by the state, people need to see that either the state Constitution is enforced or amend the state Constitution


59 posted on 03/21/2015 1:11:05 PM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson