Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer

Actually we’ve got a pretty good idea of the actual. We know the range, we know the intensity, and we know that it’s ineffective enough to have never played a serious part in either our or the USSR’s “nuclear exchange” plans.


35 posted on 04/07/2015 8:37:43 AM PDT by discostu (Bobby, I'm sorry you have a head like a potato.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

“serious part in either our or the USSR’s “nuclear exchange” plans.”

Not true. It is a big part of military planning. There is a big effort to harden military command and control facilities.

The area of influence of an emp is in fact as big as has been discussed in the article. But there is more to the story.

look up Mil-std-188-125-1 and check your own logic about emp not being part of military doctrine


43 posted on 04/07/2015 8:46:46 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson