[conservativejoy]

I think the disarming of German citizens and the following tyranny support Cruz’s position quite well.

[Quality_Not_Quantity]

I love blogs and bloggers. They think that just because their words are immortalized somewhere on the internet, they really have meaning and truth attached to them.

Not this guy.

[2ndDivisionVet]

There are dozens of such examples to choose from. Never has a government disarmed its citizens for no reason. There will be tyranny sooner or later.

[joshua c]

Liberals do not fear tyranny. I wonder why that is?

[DPMD]

Leave it to one of obama’s flunkies to make the anti-2nd Amendment argument by constructing a straw man, in the same manner as his puppet master.

The right “shall not be infringed.” It shall also not be limited in its definition by butt boys of a criminal president whose gun confiscation desires are well known.

My right is a right to keep and bear arms. It is not your right to decide why I do.

[Ohioan]

Jon Green goes on, at great length, to ignore the obvious consensus of the Founding Fathers, as to why the 2nd Amendment was necessary. It is difficult to believe that he is not aware of some of their views. Therefore his whole article is an effort at misleading; a clear attempt to deceive!

There is no honor among those who seek to change America; to divorce this generation from the American heritage; to impose restrictions on liberty, which go against the whole warp & woof of the Constitution, intended to protect that liberty.

For a better appreciation of just how far afield the writer is, The Right & Duty To Keep & Bear Arms. Note, especially, George Washington's support for adopting the Swiss system for American youth, and consider just how beneficial he understood that such would be.