To: Blood of Tyrants
Another person at the table brought that up to my libinlaw, and I think the response was somewhere between “that didn’t happen” and “that doesn’t matter”.
You’ll rarely get a lib to be embarrassed by their hypocrisy.
9 posted on
05/11/2015 11:29:19 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
Youll rarely get a lib to be embarrassed by their hypocrisy.
That is the "beauty" (for the left) of proclaiming that morality is relative. The arch-sin du jour can change 180 degrees from where it was just the day before, depending on what they need to support the narrative. Their sheep followers seem to be too stupid to realise that, or else they just block out leftist agendas other than their own. Then once in a while, they get surprised when agendas/blocs clash (such as happens once in a while with the feminist vs tranny, black vs sodomite, etc). But mostly the left just ignores inconvenient facts. They wall each bloc off from the other and pretend that it doesn't exist if there might be a clash. Or they utilise the tried-and-true tactic of getting everyone on-board by turning their focus to the evil white, Christian, heterosexual male.
12 posted on
05/11/2015 11:38:58 AM PDT by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson