Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldpuppymax

A few rhetorical questions.

How does one overturn an amendment to the constitution, and a part of the bill of rights...unconstitutional?

The idea that the court could say that possession of a weapon is only for militia, then it begets the question of just “who is the militia?” But even this is negated by the clear words “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

When they have finally made that leap..the first casualty will be that the English language is dead.


6 posted on 05/13/2015 11:26:31 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ouderkirk

The fact is, the large standing Army is incompatible with our founder’s intent, not our right to keep and bear arms. The Democrats have dragged this country into civil war once before. They may do it again. The country will not survive another one however. It isn’t 1863 anymore.


11 posted on 05/18/2015 6:16:59 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson