Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ecinkc; LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; ...

“Are people beginning to guess that the earth shattering evidence touted by Zullo was in fact MCSO’s apparent discovery that the court appointed monitor had been directed to broaden the scope of his investigation in order to scrutinize MCSO’s work on the birth certificate?”

No, this just happened...

What the “Universe Shattering Evidence” is has not been disclosed, but is still pending, according to Gallups.

Sharon Rondeau, deep in her long-winded article at the top of the thread says that Arpaio is at risk of being accused of retaliating against Obama and the DOJ for bringing immigration enforcement cases against him if he goes public with new BC or other identity fraud evidence.

Arpaio’s evidenced has to be rock solid and it really needs to be brought against Barry by some law enforcement agency OTHER THAN ARPAIO OR BY CONGRESS to avoid charges that it is just Arpaio retaliating against these stupid DOJ immigration monitoring actions!


33 posted on 05/25/2015 11:37:59 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

I see. Thanks again.


34 posted on 05/25/2015 12:12:57 PM PDT by ecinkc (Set Hillary aside for now and first focus on crushing the destructive traitors Boehner and McConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
What the “Universe Shattering Evidence” is has not been disclosed, but is still pending....

Yep.

35 posted on 05/25/2015 12:17:57 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
Arpaio’s evidenced has to be rock solid and it really needs to be brought against Barry by some law enforcement agency OTHER THAN ARPAIO OR BY CONGRESS to avoid charges that it is just Arpaio retaliating against these stupid DOJ immigration monitoring actions!

How about that mightily articulate Sheriff Clarke from Wisconsin who has been featured on Megan Kelly's and Sean Hannity's programs, discovered as we was last year during the Ferguson riots, and who continues his commentary now re: Baltimore?

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

36 posted on 05/25/2015 12:30:31 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

“What the “Universe Shattering Evidence” is has not been disclosed, but is still pending, according to Gallups.”

But the timeline suggests that Montgomery is the source of the “universe shattering information”.

In November, 2013, Zullo told Gallups that he had spent three weeks out west on the investigation and (IIRC) for the first time said the new evidence was “universe shattering”. So much so that Arpaio had started a criminal investigation.

In February, 2014 Zullo told Gallups that Arapio had assigned two MCSO detectives to the investigation.

Zullo also said that the criminal investigation part really didn’t involve the birth certificate. That Arpaio would hold a press conference about the criminal investigation evidence followed by a second press conference by Zullo involving the birth certificate.

In June, 2014 the Phoenix New Times article named two MCSO detectives (Mackiewicz, Anglin) that were doing an investigation with Montgomery. That investigation started in October, 2013.

In April, 2015, Arpaio and Sheridan told the court that two MCSO detectives (Mackiewicz, Anglin) and Zullo had spent about a month in Seattle working with Montgomery to prod him to get more evidence.

When Judge Snow asked who had the Montgomery documents Arpaio replied, “I believe Zullo does.”

It is pretty clear the “universe shattering” evidence is coming from Montgomery. Unfortunately both Arpaio and Sheridan said in court that Montgomery’s information was unreliable.

Judge Snow: “…you became aware after a considerable amount of time that the reporter was giving you junk. Is that fair to say?

Sheriff Arpaio: “Yes”.

Judge Snow: “Or the informer was giving you junk?”

Sheriff Arpaio: “Yes.”

And later

Judge Snow: “…how is it that you’ve come to conclude that the information you were getting from Mr. Montgomery is not reliable?’

Sheriff Arpaio: “I think the investigators, as time progressed, figured that he may not be reliable.”

Chief Deputy Sheridan told the court that he thought Montgomery was just stringing them along.

At this point anything produced by the Cold Case posse with Montgomery’s fingerprints pon it will be viewed as “junk”.


50 posted on 05/27/2015 6:16:29 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson