Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

but it has recently been successfully argued, by a convicted felon, that the new law allows him to legally carry. There is no language that limits it to non-felons. The current law only allows legislators to create laws that will restrict, but does not list any restrictions. Sneaky bastards know exactly how laws and ammendments are written to be vague.


3 posted on 07/06/2015 6:35:47 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cyclone59

I recall that case. It was about a non-violent felon. The case was actually quite clear.

The constitutional amendment clearly *violent* felons to be disarmed.

That is a reasonable precaution, as more and more “crimes” are being classified as felonies.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/03/mo-court-enforces-constitutional.html


4 posted on 07/06/2015 6:41:11 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson