Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: prplhze2000
FDR was the first national leader to recognize the problem of an impoverished South. I don’t like his solutions, but he was the first one to say something was wrong. At least he backed the South on the railroad fight.

Good, balanced article about the situation here. One way to look at it is northerners keeping the southerners down. Another way is private business and their ability to set their own rates being interfered with by FDR and his Interstate Commerce Commission

22 posted on 07/14/2015 11:26:24 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

A third way is to recognize that a free market doesn’t exist when there is a monopoly supplier of an essential service.

One railroad into a town, that town has no other way to ship its products. In the days before interstates and long-distance trucking, that is.

So difference in freight rates often reflected more whether there was more than one railroad into a town than the costs of shipping from that town. Differential rates between north and south may simply have reflected the larger number of southern communities served by only one railroad rather than a conspiracy to keep the South impoverished and make the North wealthy.

The owners of railroads, after all, are simply interested in making themselves wealthy, not their region.


23 posted on 07/14/2015 12:11:00 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson