Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m Not Angry At Donald Trump, I’m Angry At His Supporters
The Matt Walsh Blog ^ | August 10, 2015 | Matt Walsh

Posted on 08/10/2015 9:21:32 AM PDT by Theo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-290 next last
To: Theo; All

“...explaining why Trump is the best candidate.”

Never, never once did I say Trump was the best candidate! But I absolutely LOVE who he is pissing off.

BLUF: You only draw flak when you are directly over the target — Who is drawing the most flak...JEB, lol, yeah right.

And for GD sure it would take a whole hell of lot more than that to offend this Chief....dismissed.


161 posted on 08/10/2015 10:46:48 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

Many conservative care more about immigration than anything else. The number of conservatives like that is growing rapidly as America turns third world.

In the not too distant future, the GOP will either become an immigration restrictionist party, or it will split and America will have a new right wing nationalist party.

This is only the beginning. Few right of center millennials have any loyalty to the GOP. Older conservatives are getting fed up too. If the country shifts much further to the left than it is now, there won’t be anything left to lose if the Democrats control the entire Fed Gov.


162 posted on 08/10/2015 10:47:08 AM PDT by Empire View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Cruz is smart to not get in Trump’s crosshairs. Last thing Cruz needs is a food fight with Trump. Trump will implode and Cruz will benefit.


163 posted on 08/10/2015 10:47:44 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Now read that article I posted and tell me what YOU think his chances of winning are.

And if you think, if he starts giving yeb any serious competition, that the pubbies won’t miraculously discover ‘eligibility’ as a factor with Cruz.

I suspect, having judges in their pocket and more than one pro dead baby female on board with it, the same judges that failed to find ‘standing’ with anyone challenging the current occupant’s eligibility will roll over and play dead for the uniparty.

When you own the judiciary, and the uniparty does, anything becomes law if you wish it.

Just a suspicion mind you.

A suspicion I didn’t have prior to the debate farce and the analysis in the link I posted.


164 posted on 08/10/2015 10:48:10 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

THAT`S FUNNY!


165 posted on 08/10/2015 10:50:44 AM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

“Mexican government is going to write the US government a check for the cost of constructing a fence and securing its southern border.”

If they refused, that would be a perfect casus belli. We could establish a depopulated zone from the border down, say, to Mexico City.

That way they’d have to walk hundreds of miles if they wanted to die on the fence.


166 posted on 08/10/2015 10:51:22 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Empire View

I live in Southern CA and illegal immigration is one of my biggest issues. I voted for Prop 187 and would do so again.

I am all for building the fence and securing the border. But the idea that Trump is going to get the Mexican government to pay for something which the US government should have been doing all along is simply preposterous.


167 posted on 08/10/2015 10:51:22 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
Explain ... I don't see it that way ...

I'm being sarcastic towards a writer that has invented an entire situation so he can "comment", thereby indoctrinating the reader ln HIS particular brand of "logic"

168 posted on 08/10/2015 10:52:19 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Well?


169 posted on 08/10/2015 10:52:40 AM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Hi Theo. Hope this day sees you well.

I'm not a full-on Trump fan. I would much rather see Ted Cruz in the White House. But the degree to which Trump has kicked over the hornet's nest in the GOPe, and the sheer number of people coming out of the woodwork to force him as far from the party as possible- even using the media to impugn his character- is intriguing.

I also find it quite telling that the people most supportive of the GOPe candidates are the ones following the Alinsky playbook most closely.

If Trump is indeed a crook and a phoney, then let's light him up by all means. But if this is just more GOPe schtick because he doesn't want to play in the GOP's crapper, then the GOPe gets what it deserves: another lost election because they failed to produce a single candidate that wasn't just another stinking RINO.

On that note, I think it would be good for Trump to run as an independent. It would separate him from the GOPe fold and the Democrat party (both the same) and give Americans the chance to compare and contrast him to the other runners.

As far as Cruz goes, I would like to see him come out swinging. He may be a man of noble character, but he's swimming with man-eating sharks. Maybe he's just "rising above" the rhetoric. But if he's going to convince the nation that he can change the system, he needs to show us now that he can fight with the best of them.

We are at war. And war is no place for soft-spoken ladies and gentlemen.

One final note: the only reason that Trump could win the election is if the GOPe fails to present us with a better alternative. With the exception of Cruz (who talks well but hasn't come out swinging yet), I don't see the GOPe winning this unless they get behind a real fighter.

170 posted on 08/10/2015 10:53:28 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo
I've almost always esteemed the wisdom of free republic posters. So many of you give me information that helps me form my own decisions. You shed light on the obscure, relate history and other various enlightening tidbits of info. What the hell has happened on these posts lately when Trump is the topic? Just read these little jewels on this thread. The name calling, the sarcasm, the animosity...sure doesn't read like a place to express an opinion. I thought this was a place where conservatives were allowed to speak without fear of personal attacks because they have differing opinions. I don't think you would be treated worse on a liberal site. This isn't the only thread either. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but even I've noticed that this is becoming the norm for any thread where Trump is the subject.
171 posted on 08/10/2015 10:55:03 AM PDT by scottiemom (As a retired Texas public school teacher, I highly recommend private school)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Well, I don’t really want a war with Mexico. I would be content to stop the flow of illegals, secure our borders, and enforce existing laws.


172 posted on 08/10/2015 10:56:48 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

“Cruz is a bit tougher than that.”

I engaged in hyperbole. Still, he is far too weak to go toe to toe with Putin, the ayatollahs, or even David the bone-smoker Cameron.


173 posted on 08/10/2015 10:57:15 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Theo

The political process is already a mockery, even without Trump. I don’t want him as president, but I think it is good to have him shaking things up. He is over the top, but maybe because of him others will be more bold to speak out.


174 posted on 08/10/2015 10:57:25 AM PDT by Bookwoman (No more Bushes or Clintons "...and I am unanimous in this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

+1+1+1


175 posted on 08/10/2015 10:58:49 AM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

My real concern is Trump will run third party and elect HRC.

If Trump is the GOP presidential nominee, I will support him unconditionally, despite my personal reservations about his questionable track record.


176 posted on 08/10/2015 11:01:20 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines; lodi90
Good afternoon. Maybe I can help...

The Mexican government is going to write the US government a check for the cost of constructing a fence and securing its southern border.

You may have wanted to end with a question mark, but I could be wrong.

Of course Mexico could pay for the fence. How? Tariffs on copper wire, cement, oil, etc.. Not to mention a surtax on every Mexican incarcerated in local jails or prisons. There are other ways too.

What will be the macro effect on the U.S. economy? Negligible.

Someone around here is clearly off his meds.

Is that an ad hominem attack? Yes, but not important at this point.

It [sic] think it is most of Trump’s supporters who actually believe this nonsense.

Well, I'm not a Trump supporter, but is it really nonsense?

I hope that helps.

5.56mm

177 posted on 08/10/2015 11:03:35 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5

You talk about the DC Cartel. But just who has articulately made the case against the DC Cartel and even coined the phrase? Hint: It isn’t DT.


178 posted on 08/10/2015 11:05:49 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

“Well, I don’t really want a war with Mexico. I would be content to stop the flow of illegals, secure our borders, and enforce existing laws.”

What about the cartels, who continue to bring heroin, cocaine, and meth into this country—not to mention terrorism of a magnitude not seen since the Mau Mau rebellion?

Unlike your average border-crasher, they won’t be stopped by the fence.

What about the 30 million illegals already here? How are we ever going to find the will to expel them, absent an event like a war?

Most importantly, though, we need to slap the crap out of Mexico for all the harm they have caused us.


179 posted on 08/10/2015 11:07:11 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: dsc

He’s weak? In what way?

He’s stood before courts and argued his case.

He stood in front of the Senate and at a great threat of loss of stature within that body called the leader of the Republican party a liar.

He has repeatedly been on the wrong side of the GOP establishment. With very little support.


180 posted on 08/10/2015 11:08:48 AM PDT by saleman (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson