The Inquirer was lucky with John Edwards. You shouldn't necessarily take everything they publish as gospel.
I don't have a clue what's going on between Hillary and Huma, but the way people have of making something lurid and sensational out of the "body person" concept when it comes to politicians they don't like and not even considering such implications when it comes to those they favor makes me at least a little bit skeptical.
"Strikingly beautiful"? No, but being young and thin and able to clean up enough to take a few good photos counts for a lot with guys.
Yes, you don’t have proof, but to old DC watchers, the specifics have been there since late in the Clinton administrstion. She was a total unknown staffer who all of a sudden PR agencies were being paid 5 figures monthly to promote.
Reporters who did pro-Huma stories got great WH access and advance leaks.r
She was promoted very heavily in DC social magazines, but no mention was ever made that she lived in Adams-Morgan, the gays - only section of DC.
She was asked out my many men, but always refused. She never was out with Weiner until their engagement was announced.
Finally, there is a large CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN group of gays in DC. They all are very surprised that “you straights” ever had any doubt that Hillary was a “one baby to prove the plumbing works Lipstick Lesbian”