Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Martin Tell

Had to laugh at those pictures of kids under their desks like that was going to protect them from a blast.


25 posted on 10/23/2015 7:20:11 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: SkyDancer; All
Had to laugh at those pictures of kids under their desks like that was going to protect them from a blast.

Permit me the privilege of enlightening you a bit.

The whole 'duck and cover' drill was NEVER intended to protect school kids from the effects of a direct nuclear blast, nobody in their right mind was suggesting that.

The object of 'duck and cover' was to shield the kids from the shards of flying glass and debris that would surely be arriving after the blast wave from a nuclear detonation miles away hit their school, breaking and imploding the windows INTO their classrooms.

Those sturdy metal & wood desks would have provided at least some minimal protection from such injuries, plus it kept the kids down below the window line as well.

We were doing 'duck and cover' drills in my elementary school during the Cuban missile crisis, and I'm here to tell you that it was far better to be mentally and physically prepared for such an event, even as grade school kids. We understood the potential risks, and so did our teachers and families. Parents in my school district sent in extra provisions (cookies, crackers, Hawaiian Punch, etc.) should it become necessary for the kids to live at the schools post-strike due to radiation fallout.

We need that same level of preparation returned to our public schools today.
30 posted on 10/23/2015 7:30:47 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jeb is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat buffet. You get sick and PUKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: SkyDancer

“Had to laugh at those pictures of kids under their desks like that was going to protect them from a blast.”

Actually it probably will. When you look at the areas of circles you see that the ‘shock wave’ area of a nuclear blast is far larger by area than the ‘everything vaporizes’. The most likely danger when a bomb goes off is flying glass. Hiding under your desk is not a bad way to avoid some of that. The truth is that even for big bombs if you are a few miles away it is not the ‘skin burning off apocalypse’ that you see in Hollywood. There is a reason those shelters are called ‘fallout’ shelters and not ‘blast’ shelters. Hide in your basement two weeks until the main dust cloud goes away and you have a fairly decent chance of survival.


62 posted on 10/23/2015 8:44:52 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson