“Commenters decried the bumbling.
“One out of 14 has gone missing? That’s 7%. So, that works out to 7,000 out of every 100,000 we bring in. The Paris slaughter was brought about by 8 people. They killed over 120, which, divided by 8, gives 15+ dead per jihadist. So, 7,000 jihadists times 15 comes out to over 90,000 future victims on the table,” wrote Harry Buskin.”
Then the attack in Paris was a “setback” to the administration’s agenda because now sane states will make it harder to live there. I think this issue should be taken to the supreme court because if the feds are traitors and corrupt, the states should be able to protect themselves.
” I think this issue should be taken to the supreme court because if the feds are traitors and corrupt, the states should be able to protect themselves.”
Oh yeah. I’m sure the Supreme Court could be trusted to keep the people safe. /s
the muslim infiltrator was so obviously pissed when he said those things ... he was refering over and over to how the jihadists had had a setback .... like it was HIS JV team that lost a game