Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wbarmy

In my opinion, Tesla thought it could be worked out because in his day, the amount of power we now consume was beyond even his imagination.

He viewed the immense power of Niagara to greatly exceed any power we would ever want. In those parameters, the losses were not as important.

Today’s world is far different.

The technology works. It is in use and companies have expanded well past the phone charger on a plate. But physics have not changed, and the losses are still immense.

For more info:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/the-smarter-grid/can-energous-deliver-on-wireless-power-promises


16 posted on 11/19/2015 9:31:23 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Governments at all levels have intense fetishes in maximizing the energy efficiency (minimizing losses) of our homes and autos, usually to the detriment of the consumer (vastly higher capital cost, higher maintenance costs, poor reliability, poor performance, early obsolescence). They will sink their regulatory hooks into wireless energy transmission before it gets launched because of inherent high losses and “health effects.”


28 posted on 11/19/2015 11:45:35 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson