Posted on 12/08/2015 7:01:22 PM PST by The Looking Spoon
Conservative: “No, we’re done here.” First words out of my mouth followed by “Make your move.”
LOL, nice...
Haha! Touche :-)
Some rather good meat in here, thanks.
Similar arguments made here. Will make you smile.
http://www.battlefield315.com/2011/04/gun-control-explained.html
First of all, the author is giving up one truth to our enemies lies without even knowing what he is doing.
By accepting that “gun violence” is bad, he is accepting a clear lie.
Neither violence or gun violence are inherently evil. When American armies freed Europe from the Nazis, they were using plenty of violence and gun violence.
Do these people not understand that? When a citizen stops a rape/murder in progress with violence, is that bad? Of course not.
So quit agreeing with the anti gun nuts that gun violence is evil.
8<)
read
“Conservative: As this video points out, (it’s 6 minutes, but it’s worth your time and makes this point crystal clear) it isn’t conservative “gun nuts” in Texas driving America’s murder rate, it’s violence and murder spurred by gangs in inner cities that are wholly owned by the Democratic Party.”
Here’s the direct link to the video. The website you linked to had so many pop-ups and ads it covered most of my screen!!!
http://youtu.be/pELwCqz2JfE
The liberals do not realize that their biggest and best supporters of their “gun control” wishes are criminals and terrorists....
BFL
The only problem with this is that it assumes use of logical argument is possible with these people.
The Karl Denninger (Market Ticker) line of logic-—’The Second Amendment exists because in The Declaration the founders declared that you have a natural right to life; that is, you have a right to live simply because you are human.
No right is real unless you can defend it for yourself and those who you love (such as your children.)
The Second Amendment codifies a pre-existing right to defend your life, and the life of your loved ones, against any evil individual or group that would attempt to take life by unlawful means. That right is absolute and thus so is the Second Amendment. It is only when that right is abused by criminal action with said firearm(s) that one may be sanctioned.
The security of a free state does not only require that an invading army be able to be repelled.
Security also includes internal threats within a nation whether individual or collective.
The Security of a Free State was violated in San Bernardino just as certainly as it is when a thug breaks into your home in the middle of the night.
There are those who argue that we should have a list of prohibited guns, persons and the like. What those people are arguing is that those persons have no right to either their life or that of their loved ones.
Think about what you’re saying if you hold those beliefs very, very carefully:
You are declaring some people to be so much lesser than you that they do not have the right to live and further, you are declaring that someone else gets to make and update that list — which could quite-easily wind up with your name on it. Further, you have managed to collectively get some fifty thousand gun laws on the books of this nation and every one of them, and thus every one of you, has directly contributed to the lack of security of a free state exhibited in San Bernardino and elsewhere.’
I loved these videos. Battlefield315 did some really good ones on a number of subjects.
I didn’t “give up” that truth...I pointed out “the prosperity earned through the liberty you enjoy was earned in war and nothing less.”
That hits the nail squarely on the head. Thanks.
I question your statistic of 112.6 guns owned per 100,000 U.S. population. Seems rather low.
Glad you like it :-D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.