Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
"I am CERTAIN that’s what they did when defending Obama."

No, they never resolved any of the cases on merits. They might have taken that approach if they had, but they didn't get that far. They rejected them all on either grounds of standing, or because the issue had been sufficiently tweeted, or because of procedural issues such as (It's too early to sue because Inelligible hasn't been elected yet, and it's too late to sue because Inelligible has been seated.)

147 posted on 01/16/2016 7:23:00 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

What a mess!


149 posted on 01/16/2016 7:30:08 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (1000 muslim migrant gang-rapists in Germany -- Trump helped trigger protests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
FWIW, the Indiana Court of Appeals indulged in a superfluous analysis of Obama's eligibility in the Ankeny v. Kruse case. Vattel makes an appearance.
160 posted on 01/16/2016 7:58:14 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson