Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: scrabblehack
Not as I understand it. The intent of the Scottish Parliament is to be very open to public petitions, so there are no citizenship or residence requirements - to some extent, that is understandable. As there is no such thing as Scottish citizenship (only British citizenship) it would be very difficult to restrict such a right only to Scots and they also did not want to exclude non-citizens resident in Scotland (and therefore subject to Scottish law) or those who are part of the Scottish diaspora overseas. But it does allow for a degree of foreign interference in Scots issues.

The plus side is that a petition in which a person has no clear standing can be dealt with very quickly - the requirement for it to be considered is not onerous - it can be dismissed quite quickly unless it clearly relates to an important issue in Scots law.

19 posted on 01/31/2016 6:17:31 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

Is there not a minimum number of signatures necessary for a petition to go to Parliament? Otherwise it seems they would be flooded with all sorts of idiotic ones.


20 posted on 01/31/2016 7:48:53 PM PST by Rockpile (GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson