Carson Adviser Armstrong Williams, Not Cruz Campaign, Announced Possible Suspension of Campaign

The conservative Historian ^ | February 2, 2016 | Jonathan Henderson

[SeekAndFind]

re: You did nothing to alleviate the critique. How do you know Carson didn’t do well enough for 14 percent, or 13 percent?

Same question can be asked of you, how do you know that he did?

My answer is this -— I do not believe that Iowa voters are DUMB enough to base their vote on a tweet from an opposing candidate.

There might be a few, but not enough to significantly change the 9% he got.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Same question can be asked of you, how do you know that he did?

Bizarre retort.

My answer is this -— I do not believe that Iowa voters are DUMB enough to base their vote on a tweet from an opposing candidate.

People are dumber than you think, and it wasn't from a "tweet," it was Cruz staff present at the caucus sites. Just 4 people per caucus needed to be convinced to give Cruz his lead.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Bizarre retort.

Not bizzare at all. I’d like you to produce evidence of this 13 to 14% vote that he could have gotten. Did you count all votes that could have been but did not happen? If so, this would be prima facie evidence for a recount.

You will be on to something. I suggest that if you are a Carson supporter, you and Carson’s staffers work together to gather enough of these “dumb” people (if it is 4 per precinct, surely finding only 50 of them would be enough ) to show the Republican party that this caucus was tainted by Cruz staffers.

BTW, where were Carson staffers to counter these Cruz staffers? If these lies were being spread by these staffers, Carson supporters should be there to tell Carson voters not to believe them.

Also, we should be gathering the names of these Cruz staffers spreading these lies in the sites and PUBLICLY inform Cruz who these people are and challenge him to fire them.

Do this and maybe I’ll believe you but not until.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Not bizzare at all.

It's bizarre because you're asking me to prove something you know cannot be proved, because you cannot prove the opposite. Your own impulse here proves my point: that you cannot assert how much or how little Carson was hurt by Cruz's dirty tricks.

BTW, where were Carson staffers to counter these Cruz staffers?

Carson even claims that Cruz staffers interfered with Carson staffers, trying to impede them from speaking.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: It’s bizarre because you’re asking me to prove something you know cannot be proved, because you cannot prove the opposite.

Therefore, as I said before, everything is speculation unless you can provide positive evidence. How are we going to resolve this other than this?

I have given you a way of showing that you are correct. You said it only takes 4 per site to add to the Carson’s 9%. Well, let’s get the names of a few of these people who changed their mind because of this rumor.

As for dirty tricks, again, it should be easy to get the name of the Cruz staffer who lied about Carson quitting. Let’s get this person so that he can be fired.

You are the one who claim that these people exist, it should not be hard to find one or two.

GET THEIR NAMES. I’LL HELP YOU POST IT.