I wasn’t agreeing with you that Trump was wrong...I was telling YOU that you shouldn’t make comments without proof...
I know, I was just laughing at the irony.
Trump says Cruz worked with the unrelated SuperPAC without proof: Okay according to you.
Trump’s supporters say Cruz worked with the unrelated SuperPAC without proof: Okay with you.
I say Cruz didn’t work with the unrelated SuperPAC because there’s no proof: You demand I prove a negative.
I swear its like talking to the Clinton White House in the 90’s. People can make accusations against the enemy all day long without proof and you’re happy. Someone calls them on it and you demand that they prove the people without evidence are the ones who are wrong.
That’s not how things work. Allegations have to be proven, not disproved. What’s next? The nature of the evidence is irrelevant, it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”?