Posted on 03/30/2016 10:23:35 AM PDT by MichCapCon
Whether or not a student can read in the early grades is a clear indicator of future success. Schools should not keep sending kids onto the next grade if they lack basic reading skills. This “social promotion” often does more harm than good.
As the state Legislature debates House Bill 4822 and strategies to advance early literacy, the Battle Creek Enquirer’s editors have laid down a strong claim. Their March 10 editorial argued against any use of the strategy of third-grade retention (holding back students) — presumably out of a desire to protect kids. To follow their recommended course, though, would eliminate an approach that promises to help many of Michigan’s neediest students.
Clearly, the decision to have a struggling reader repeat third grade should not be made lightly or without considering a student’s unique situation. The evidence for focused retention strategies, though, points toward real benefits for those students who arrive at school lacking some of the building blocks of literacy. These students need some extra time to catch up.
The critical importance of becoming proficient by the end of third grade is well understood. According to research by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, missing that benchmark increases the chances a student will fail to graduate on time — fourfold.
Under former Gov. Jeb Bush, the state of Florida took the lead in pioneering a slate of reforms to address the challenge. Michigan policymakers would be wise to take heed.
One thing Florida does is prohibit third-graders who score in the lowest level on the state reading test from automatically advancing to the next grade. Struggling readers get several opportunities to pass the test and are provided alternative ways of showing that they meet the basic reading standard. Specific exemptions are allowed for students with disabilities, newer English Language Learners, and those who have already been held back twice.
Struggling Florida readers receive interventions both before the end of third grade and during the remedial year, including summer reading camps and 90-minute daily periods of tutoring, guided by scientifically based reading instruction. The Sunshine State has invested heavily in disseminating SBRI principles and techniques to its teachers. That’s significant because a major 2014 report by the National Council on Teacher Quality found most of the nation’s education schools do not adequately equip elementary teachers in this area.
Tracking two comparable groups of Florida students, a 2006 study showed that those who were retained made measurable progress in reading skills for the first two years, while students experiencing social promotion fell further behind. According to a later analysis by Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance, Florida’s policy led to “large positive effects on achievement” and decreased a student’s likelihood for future retention (though like most tested education interventions, the advantage eventually fades).
Results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress bring the challenge closer to home. Over the past 12 years, Michigan’s fourth-grade reading scores have slipped below the national average, while Florida’s scores have soared and plateaued. Today, Florida’s scores in fourth-grade reading just for low-income students are higher than Michigan’s overall average reading scores, counting both low-income and non-low-income students.
To bolster its case for social promotion, the Enquirer editorial cites two less relevant pieces of research. The first, a brief summary from the National Association of School Psychologists, predates the Florida program and includes important caveats about the value of remedial strategies. The second explores a data set of students from the 1970s and 1980s, finding broad harms caused by student retention. Its conclusions clash with rigorous academic research on specific programs targeted at struggling low-income elementary students in Chicago and New York City.
The Enquirer suggests that a host of alternatives to retention, including large-scale class size reduction and preschool programs, would be better. Yet the best evidence for each indicates very little or no benefit in return for large sums of taxpayer expenditures.
Third-grade retention is not a magical cure-all that will make all kids competent lifetime readers. But Florida’s example shows that far more Michigan students stand to benefit if we put aside warm feelings about social promotion.
First grade is the best time to hold them back.
.
Social promotion is why we have high school graduates who can’t read or write on better than a 5th grade level.
Besides - if states did away with social promotion the BLM crowd would scream “RACISM” at every turn as blacks would be held back but not white kids.
This “social promotion” garbage is the cause from a couple of generations of adults barely “semi-literate”. Those slow readers, promoted to the next grade, are condemned to fall further and further behind the other students.
They were spared the “shame” of being “kept back”, and forced to live with the real shame of lagging being their fellow students, further behind the year. Eventually, frustration and bad feeling result in another drop-out.
The “social engineering” of social promotions is doing permanent harm to thousands of youngsters, having been cheated out of the opportunity to progress at their pace, and eventually catch up and become a fully literate adult.
From the foundation of the country unti the moodern EDUCATORS replaced teachers, the American school systems produced the most highly educated and able population in history.
Today, the main effort of the EDUCATORS is to explain why so many thousands of students are failing. They are not being given a chance to work and succeed.
"If they can read and write simple sentences and can count to 500 that is all the Poles proles need to know. That and to obey their German New World Order masters."
H. Himmler G. Soros
Some 15 or so years ago, the Missouri legislature passed a massive bill—100s of pages—overhauling the educational system of the state. Even better, they did all of this in just a matter of days. Then it turns out that a Representative or Senator had snuck in an item that required that 3rd graders had to be able to read at the 3rd-grade level before moving on to the 4th grade.
First off, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, ordered schools to ignore the law as plainly written (remind you of ObamaCare?) until the legislature repealed the offending bit. Visions of 15-year olds sitting in 3rd-grade desks were part of the scare tactics. That and the disparate effect on minority students that the law would have, won the day. Thankfully, it is still possible for illiterates to “graduate” from high school in Missouri.
Because I was consistently bored to death in school, I would frequently have convenient "stomach flu" and would miss school. At the end of the year it was determined that I would have to attend summer school to make up the missed attendance.
The only thing I remember from that lost summer was an art class during which I created a construction-paper poster featuring London's Big Ben clock tower.
The irony is that the public education system spent resources to insure that I attended the required number of days, despite having no academic issues whatever. I don't know if any of the students in my class needed remedial instruction in reading, but the resource was instead squandered and completely ruined my summer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.