[ All you’ve got is a hypothesis, and one that is easily ruled out as not feasible, because predictions based on that hypothesis fail to match the observed data. A failed hypothesis, in science, is relegated to the dustbin, not doggedly propped up with flawed arguments. It is the people who refuse to abandon a failed hypothesis who are in fact doing exactly what the “climate change” crowd is doing. ]
Then what is wrong with a parent playing is safe and spacing out the vaccines and doing them one at a time?
Shouldn’t it be the parent’s choice anyways?
“Then what is wrong with a parent playing is safe and spacing out the vaccines and doing them one at a time?”
A parent can choose to do that, but what you are doing, that I am taking issue with, is publicly advocating junk science. You have a 1st amendment right to do that, I suppose, but don’t be surprised when people continue to point out that you are wrong.