Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: amnestynone

“Pennsylvania is winnable with Trump.”

Forgetting these last two elections, the question is which blue state is Trump most likely to take from Clinton? The battleground, with everything being equal is Ohio. The only proof that Cruz would lose to Hillary is anti Cruz Republicans would stay home. The same applies to Trump with the exception that he would pull Sanders anti establishment voters away from Hillary.

People get wee wee’d up about the black and Hispanic vote. It’s irrelevant since it only applies to blue states that win by one city having 125% of the vote, aka Philly,

The bigger question that needs to be asked is whether Trumo being the nominee has an impact on Texas? If anti Trump voters from Texas stay home, it’s over.


51 posted on 04/27/2016 9:59:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (United we stand, divided we fall. I think the establishment has divided us enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

“which blue state is Trump most likely to take from Clinton?”

First order of business is to win FL, NC, VA, NM and OH. After that any one of NH, PA, NV or CO gets you the election. Of those the easiest to the hardest are PA, NV, NH and CO. Trump has the ability to win them all.

“the nominee has an impact on Texas?”

If Trump were to lose Texas because of the Cruz voters then they ought to run them out of the country...the shame will be on them.


57 posted on 04/27/2016 10:49:13 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz

BTW...I can tell you the states that CRuz would lose right off the bat. Florida and Virginia. And with that he would lose the election.


58 posted on 04/27/2016 10:53:53 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz
The only proof that Cruz would lose to Hillary is... the fact the guy has won only 4 primaries (forget the caucuses - the general election ain't a caucus!), that he is now consistently finishing 3rd in a 3-way race, and that he's increasingly perceived as being too sleazy, even for politics.

The guy can't even carry his own party, for chrissakes. He couldn't even take a majority in his home state.

Endorsements from his place of work (the Senate)? Forget it. Everyone there hates him.

Positions on the issues of the day? Corker amendment. TPP. Amnesty/immigration. In a word, everything that voters are fed up with and are trying to get rid of.

But Good Ol' Ted - he just keeps plowing ahead, oblivious to what's going on around him, let alone what's happening in the world.

Here's the point - the Dems, for once, seem poised to put up the weakest possible candidate, and if Cruz is injected into this scenario, a loss of truly epic proportions awaits him, with future historians wondering en masse just how a now-defunct political party could have committed suicide like that.

He is not a man of his time. That situation passed some time ago.

For the country, the situation threatens to become dire, and most Americans sense that what went down in the past is not going to cut it now.

We don't need a Mafia lawyer wannabe leading us - we need a LEADER! We need a man who can get things done. We need a Charlemagne.

WE NEED DONALD TRUMP!

CA....

72 posted on 04/27/2016 11:59:09 AM PDT by Chances Are (Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson