Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bone Texan

Here is a bit more to this weight issue....

The criterion for minimum weight is actually 6.8 kilos which is closer to 15.1 lb. This was established in 2000 with the objective of making sure that no one racing would make their bikes so light that they would be structurally unsound, fragile and dangerous. What they did not foresee at that time was the significant advancements of carbon fibers which mean that the weight could in fact be reduced while still being quite sound. Thus back to my earlier comment.... if a structurally sound bike can be built that only weights 5 lb (and they are in fact at that point now), this simply means that the potential size of a battery (that when inserted still allows the bike to remain below the minimum weight criterion of 15 lb) could weigh as much as twice the weight of the bike itself.... 5 lb bike with a 10 lb battery in the frame. Crazy, huh?


28 posted on 05/04/2016 5:46:17 AM PDT by hecticskeptic (In life it's important to know what you believe�.but more more importantly, why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: hecticskeptic

Yes, crazy!


30 posted on 05/04/2016 7:35:24 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson