Posted on 06/26/2016 5:13:23 PM PDT by cvolkay
Reagan did exactly that to Mondale..........
BTW, just recently The Smashing Pumpkin's (fairly popular rock-band) front man Billy Corgan referred to these silly narcissists known as "Social Justice Warriors," as Maoists and cultists.
Nice, a rocker with a brain. Now I will have to watch one of their youtube vids, to show my appreciation.
Tell them to check their leftist, emotional thinking privilege.
Let’s start with ending the name calling here.
There’s a small but rather nasty contingent that sometimes seems to be hanging around.
In the end, we’re all FReepers :)
Interesting, another way of saying “flip it.” Is this really in a body of work by Mills?
The Donald is a master at it too.
“Let’s start with ending the name calling here.”
—
You are joking,of course. You are quite good at personal insults yourself.
.
Bkmrk.
All in Bambi’s mentor, Saul Alinsky’s ‘rules for radicals ‘ # 5
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.”
Rope or garrotte wire?
Guillotine.
Rusty dull blades.
I enjoy using their name-calling attacks against them. Since they are so fond of abortions, call them child molesters or child abusers.
That was kind of ironic.
Ah, if you could see me you’d have insults for days. REAL ONES :)
5 10, 340. and that’s DOWN from 430 :)
Very High IQ and make average salary at best :)
I’m not embarrassed at being half a loser!!
I’m working on becoming a full one!!!
I know, I know, I’m very close!!
The best and only real way to defeat them is to defund them. Tough to do.
Ditto. My goal is to make them cry.
Nothing more fun than to make a lefty halfwit blow a gasket.
I have found that calling names is just a way to change the subject. Someone calls me a racist, I ask what has that got to do with the discussion? I’m also a lot of things. But they don’t have to do with the topic of discussion, either. Can we stay on task here and not get personal? If you’d like, when we finish the discussion, we can start calling each other names. But I’m working with facts on the topic, and you’re working with conjecture on me. Mine are proven, you’re guessing.
red
I have found that calling names is just a way to change the subject. Someone calls me a racist, I ask what has that got to do with the discussion? I’m also a lot of things. But they don’t have to do with the topic of discussion, either. Can we stay on task here and not get personal? If you’d like, when we finish the discussion, we can start calling each other names. But I’m working with facts on the topic, and you’re working with conjecture on me. Mine are proven, you’re guessing.
red
SJWs always project.
SJWs always double down.
There's a book about that, purple cover with a smiley face and forked tongue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.