Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Hillary Clinton
fbi.gov ^ | July 05, 2016 | FBI National Press Office

Posted on 07/05/2016 2:37:20 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2016 2:37:20 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

He lays out what sounds like a strong case against Hillary Clinton. Yet in the end he contradicts everything he said by saying he would not recommend prosecution.

How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????


2 posted on 07/05/2016 2:40:06 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

See too at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3446438/posts


3 posted on 07/05/2016 2:41:23 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

“There was “evidence of potential violations” of laws against handling classified information, Comey said.”

Comey added, “Nonetheless, let me again remind you that laws and indictments are only for the little people, and Hillary Clinton is simply too important of a person for the application of laws designed for unimportant people to follow. Therefore, unfortunately, my hands are tied.”


4 posted on 07/05/2016 2:42:16 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

He is using double speak to provide some HA explanation for this abomination! He is on the list now.


5 posted on 07/05/2016 2:42:23 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Hillary’s willful misconduct and gross negligence was cause for indictment. Comey is a sell-out. FUJC.


6 posted on 07/05/2016 2:43:44 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America ((Some of you characterized my FReep name as 'paranoid' a few years back.. Care to apologize now?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Come is another liberal turd in need of flushing.


7 posted on 07/05/2016 2:44:03 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3446438/posts


8 posted on 07/05/2016 2:45:20 PM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzrims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Dear Mr. Comey....RESIGN.

Go write your book.

9 posted on 07/05/2016 2:45:29 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
-- How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment? --

As a legal technicality, on the basis that the evidence doesn't clearly meet the elements of 18 USC 793.

But he is duplicitous. He knows the facts make an easy 18 USC 1924(a) case.

He knows the talking heads will follow his 793 bait, which leads to a stalemate (in argument) at best, and could well result in agreement that Hillary's conduct doesn't meet 793.

10 posted on 07/05/2016 2:46:49 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

“These aren’t the droids you are looking for!”

blah-blah-blah-server-blah-blah-no wrong doing- blah-blah-blah ...

STINKING ^%$ ^%^%$ &^%#(&^ ^%*$ *&@(% (#*&$%-&*^5#(*& WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY!!


11 posted on 07/05/2016 2:47:49 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Comey chose to live over dying to save the Republic.


12 posted on 07/05/2016 2:48:33 PM PDT by Dacula (Southern lives matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

13 posted on 07/05/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT by PROCON (Americans First or Terrorists First - Choose in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

That's right.

Laws for thee and not for me!

Comey, you piece of pond scum!

14 posted on 07/05/2016 2:48:55 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Drain the swamp. This guy runs a department that can’t even connect the dots when someone is a blatant “look at me” terrorist.


15 posted on 07/05/2016 2:49:37 PM PDT by King Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Comey is a double-talking self-contradicting liar who has made himself complicit in the crime(s).


16 posted on 07/05/2016 2:51:17 PM PDT by Ray76 (The evil effect of Obergefell is to deprive the people of rule of law & subject us to tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????

Easy.

Hillary is queen. The head of the nation's security does not indict the queen.

17 posted on 07/05/2016 2:51:53 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ("And, if you're not queen, my dear, think you that you're wronged?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Sadly the powers that be would never have allowed Comey to become FBI director if they did not have something to remind him of when the day came for him to do the right thing. That day has come and has now gone.


18 posted on 07/05/2016 2:57:50 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts.

So am I to understand, as long as I break the law in a manner that has never been prosecuted before I don't have to worry about the penalties?

19 posted on 07/05/2016 3:00:14 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
How the heck does he reconcile the case he outlined against Hillary with a decision not to seek indictment????

He laid back and thought of his pension as Hillary was ramming it home behind him...

20 posted on 07/05/2016 3:00:19 PM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson