Posted on 07/27/2016 5:10:55 AM PDT by MichCapCon
Cities across Michigan and the nation are struggling to pay out their promised pensions. Retiree liabilities were a root cause of Detroit's bankruptcy before a grand bargain trimmed benefits and required the city to set its pensions on a path toward solvency.
Here are six numbers that explain the pension problems in Michigans largest city and what is being done going forward.
1. Nine Years Thats how long Detroit could fund its entire transportation system with the money it will spend on its pension bankruptcy settlement.
According to Detroits 2015 audit, transportation costs the city $100 million per year. Detroits pension settlement will cost $979 million through 2023. This money could also fund the citys water system for three years or sewage for 2 1/2 years.
2. $195 million Thats how much Michigan taxpayers paid to bail out Detroits pension system.
Taxpayers took a hit for Detroits failed pension system. Detroit isnt alone, though, as lots of cities around Michigan havent been putting away enough money. Flint has had an emergency manager put in place six times since 2002, but its pension system remains at only 47 percent funded with a $285 million liability.
3. $1.33 billion Thats the amount Detroit cut from retirees pensions during bankruptcy.
Michigans Constitution protects government pensions as contractual rights, but in federal bankruptcy court, those contracts can be amended. Detroit promised to invest its employees money and pay them benefits when they retired.
During bankruptcy, Detroit also eliminated $200 million of required contributions.
The city was forced to cut the police and fire retirement systems cost-of-living adjustments by 55 percent. Detroit also eliminated general employee cost-of-living adjustments and cut benefits by 4.5 percent.
4. $1.59 billion Thats how much Detroits pension system is still underfunded.
Before bankruptcy, Detroits unfunded liability was close to $2.92 billion. After the elimination of $1.33 billion from settlements described above, the city still owes $1.6 billion more to retirees than it has set aside to pay. Detroits audit said the city hopes to have the pension system 75 percent funded by 2023.
But the city is on a better path. Detroit employees no longer earn benefits under the terms of its old system. They are now offered benefits through a hybrid pension system, which offers less generous benefits when the system is underfunded.
5. $5.7 billion Thats the how much Detroit cut employees' other post-employment benefits (OPEB).
OPEBs do not receive the same constitutional protections as pensions, so Detroit more easily cut them.
6. 129 Thats the number of full-time uniformed police Detroit has lost since the 2013 bankruptcy and pension crisis.
The city had 2,389 full-time uniformed police employees in June 2013 but is down to 2,260 today. The fire department has lost 100 employees and public works has declined by 209 workers; health, transportation and education programs also lost people.
When cities dont put aside enough money to pay for pensions, the costs skyrocket. In city after city, at the state level, and in the public schools, pension costs are crowding out public services. The state and local governments should be shifting new employees off pensions and onto 401(k) plans to prevent liabilities in the future.
“5. $5.7 billion Thats the how much Detroit cut employees’ other post-employment benefits (OPEB). “
Now I’m curious as to what the remainder is in that category.
I was surprised to see that this OPEB category exceeded the pension category. The OPEB cut is larger than the entire pension liability, before the cut.
Next up: Chicago. The city “owes” a pension debt of 8 times annual revenues or about $20,000 per residents (and the population is dropping).
>
And who and what party governs these cities? The patients have to heal themselves and the remedies will be painful. Children need to be taught that you can’t sustain spending more than your income. Simple, isn’t it! However, how else will politicians be able to buy votes without bankrupting their cities, states, and nation? God Bless America
>
Well, 1st one has to learn the immorality and illegality of robbing Peter to pay Paul (IE: The ‘promises’ of two parties, both on the same side of the table vs. the taxpayers on the other).
The 5th & 13th *MEAN* something (top to bottom). If one can, by ‘approval by ballot’, still economically enslave a people...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.