We don’t know what the future will look like. I am an all of the above person when it comes to energy and may the best technology win (and it will).
Yes we do know what future energy paths look like. Physics creates uncrossable boundaries for future paths. The difference is between inventing unknown ideas and rigid physics.
The future of energy is here already. It is called hydrocarbons eg gasoline, because they exist convenient to humans’ body temperature.
Democrats NEVER compete because they always lose. So they invent scams because when spending Other People’s Money, ANY SCAM WINS!
Hydrogen will never replace hydrocarbon gasoline.
Never.
Only Nuclear fusion has higher energy.
EVERYTHING Democrats do is a scam to spend your loot: hydrogen, wind, alar, climate change, PBS, public school etc.
Hydrogen will be an energy source; but, not as commonly envisioned. The line of thinking per the article is about hydrogen per unit weight is about 25 times as much energy content as TNT—a lesser multiple as compared to liquid fuels in common use which contain carbon—with Methane (CH3) of NG coming closest to pure hydrogen. They diminish the storage issues when considering using H2 as a transportation fuel.