Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

NOL is far from a loophole while deducting used undies surely is.


5 posted on 10/04/2016 12:40:42 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

I was about to say the same thing. What kind of loophole is used underwear, hmmm?

I just got through with our personal return, and I looked for every dime allowable. Not doing so would mean more for the greedily wasteful government. Not all of us have a pay to play scheme operating through the state department.


69 posted on 10/04/2016 1:07:19 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch ( I would LOVE to have my old "substandard" insurance back. It didn't cost $1300 a month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded
NOL is far from a loophole while deducting used undies surely is.

Trump should always bring this up, whenever his taxes are mentioned.

94 posted on 10/04/2016 1:32:33 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Stay ignorant, my friends! (if you watch mainstream media, you will!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

If the government provides s “loophole” then use it.

If the government cannot control loopholes, then the government needs yo simplify the code.

Simplify the code.

Simplify the code. Yes?

Or keep it difficult so people will have to continually rely on paid experts to figure out the yearly tax conundrum.

How about keeping the best interests of everyday common folks on mind and simplifying the tax code?


101 posted on 10/04/2016 1:42:15 PM PDT by Clutch Martin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson