He thought it better to disappear in Syria than to to be “available” in the U.S. to address this. Typical elitist.
Furthermore, he did qualify it with if true, which is at least more than liberals do. Wikileaks does have a track record of providing the truth, however, it is always best to verify if possible what comes out of even there. For the simple reason that they may be relying on that record to slip in an untruth here and there.
I am the first to admit that at times I too can be fooled by someone I trusted to tell me the truth, and as a result inadvertently pass it along without doing more research. Primarily because I am being lazy and the lie is so believable. But mostly because I trust the source to not pass on something to me that is not the truth. That is when you are the most vulnerable. It's usually a chain reaction, because the person I trusted held the same trust with whom they had received it from.
But yes, let's throw Shawn Hannity to the wolves like Milo, and trash him for this poor choice of judgement on this occasion even though his judgement is usually pretty reliable. Because after all we are far more superior.