Wikipedia is a good source for getting an overview of the subject and references to work from. It is not a primary source, but sure is helpful when you need to find out the essence of a subject quickly.
I wouldn't trust Wikipedia on any sociological subject, however. Even the references are likely to be suspect on those. I stick with science and other topics that are less susceptible to leftist propagandizing.
I sort of agree with you about Wiki when it comes to
definitions and minor points I might have forgotten.
And, yes, it provides a DEGREE of overview but for
Cal Berkeley to bother with it as the article indicates,
well, I suspect that their time could be better spent.
I think I might use Wiki to aim me in a previously
unknown direction but I wouldn’t want to use enough
of it to be compelled to have to cite it as a source
unless I was back in high school.