CNBC had her on this morning.
She only knows what she reads in the paper.
Well then good for Maria Bartiromo because sshe was on it this morning.
IOW, she blatantly affirmed Trump’s allegations............................
We need to start referring to Farkas as a whistleblower.
It appears to me that Obama’s “intelligence community” is trying to pull a coup on the Trump administration. I’m starting to wonder though if the Rooskis didn’t “influence” the elections in 2008 and 2012. I believe that Team Obama colluded with the Rooskis and that is why Obama sent Clintoon to Russia with the toy “reset” button after he was elected. That and Obama telling the Russian ambassador to tell Vlad that he would be more “flexible” after the 2012 election. If anyone colluded with the Rooskis, it was Obama.
Drip...drip...drip...SPLASH!
That would work in the past, but not in the Internet age when multiple web sites are still asking the question.
I googled this because I was curious about it in another thread. The only non-conservative site touching it was in Israel.
It ain’t going away.
They might as well suck it up and realize, their “magic negro” is going down.
There’s a reason he’s out of the country. He knows, and we all know, it’s coming.
I listened to Hannity last night and he was going crazy over this story. In all honesty, I really want it to be true but it seems her remarks were more ambiguous. Maybe it’s just me...
She apparently left the DOD in Oct 2015 and started working at Atlantic Council in Feb 2016... for whatever that's worth.
“deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia in the Obama White House in 2015”
Beyond her revelations about spreading anti-Trump intel, Farkas could be important to unravelling the whole Russian interference narrative. It stems from Clinton’s interference in Ukraine, that helped cause the coup there, and triggered civil war and disaster.
Why did Clinton interfere in Ukrainian politics and long term Russian interests? What was Farkas’s role in creating and pursuing this policy, and the anti-Russian sanctions in its aftermath? Do the accusations against Trump associates relate mostly to Ukraine? I have the impression that they do, and that the reason for surveillance was that Manafort and others were on the “wrong side” of Obama’s anti-Russian policy developed in reaction to Hillary’s debacle. It is time for a complete airing of how and why Clinton/Obama came to subordinate US policy and politics to Ukrainian nationalism.