Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

After following some (because I grew tired of it) of the Russian collusion nonsense, I felt compelled to say this. Thanks.
1 posted on 04/04/2017 10:24:01 AM PDT by mononymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mononymous
Also, the Democrats were counting on winning the election - because they, with the help of their Media allies, would have been able to bury this deep with control of the government.

Of course, it would have been an open secret in The Swamp - but just so the ruling Democrats could laugh at the Republicans, and rub it in as they appointed more black-robed clowns to run the country as a judicial oligarchy.

2 posted on 04/04/2017 10:29:34 AM PDT by kiryandil (Americ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous

Prior to Nov. 8 the espionage of the Trump Team was to dig up dirt to derail his candidacy.
After Nov. 8 it was a false-flag subterfuge operation (just like the Bengahzi YouTube misdirection).


3 posted on 04/04/2017 10:35:27 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous
I believe you are a little shortsighted in your conclusion.

You're looking at conviction and incarceration of the guilty individuals. This is where you need to look deeper.Rice and Obama are tips of the Democrat sewer hole. Granted they are at the top of it, but how far down does it go? What members of Congress were privy to the leakage of information they should not have gotten in the first place?

Notice that the CBC has been really quiet about all this except for Maxine 'the Delusional' Waters. How many of the CBC knew about it? How many on BOTH sides of the aisle knew it was going on?

How ever far down this hole this goes, one thing is for certain. ALL the exposure of the corruptness of the Democrats will be on full display. Every official coming up for re-election is going to have to answer for it.Every one of them should be primaried with this debacle front and center used against them during the campaign.

If it goes as far as I believe it does, this could spell the end of the Democrat Party as we know it.

4 posted on 04/04/2017 10:37:01 AM PDT by Wizdum (Buckle up! It's going to be one hell of a ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous
(3) Obama was obviously aware of what was going on here and it was the reason why, with days remaining in office, he authorized the exchange of intelligence between the various agencies. He knew.

He authorized the exchanges because it would then 'muddy the waters' as to where any intel originally came from if it were in all databases at the same time, thus buying them some time to bury and obfuscate even more of their crimes......................................

5 posted on 04/04/2017 10:38:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous

I think that Obama knew what was going on and he holds most if not all of the answers to this. He knew, and everybody’s trying to cover it up. He’s the one who should be brought before congress.


7 posted on 04/04/2017 10:39:32 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous
I would add:

(4) Obama was unconcerned about leaving "bread crumbs" behind, because he expected Hillary Clinton to win.

-PJ

9 posted on 04/04/2017 10:42:31 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous
Pretty frequently, when the Democrats accuse their opponents of wrongdoing, they're doing it to help conceal their own wrongdoing.

For example, if they accuse you of cheating in an election, it's to conceal their own cheating or to at least make it harder for you to accuse them of cheating. It's kind of a wet blanket used to help prevent your argument from catching fire.

And if they then accuse you of deflecting, it's just to muddle their own deflecting.

If they accuse you of collusion, it's to complicate the issue of their own collusion.

If they accuse you of rigging an election, it's to obfuscate their own election rigging activities.

12 posted on 04/04/2017 10:48:09 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson