Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLibZone; RC one

What you and RC one said...


6 posted on 04/23/2017 4:15:01 PM PDT by null and void (Drain the swamp! Get rid of the mosque-itoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
The 6.5 is nice because it does have a better ballistic coefficient than a .308 projectile of a comparable weight but the trend right now seems to be shorter barrels and I don't think you really enjoy the benefits of a better ballistic coefficient from a 16" barrel the way you would in a 20"-24" barrel.

That being the case, I'm presently working on a project that involves 130 grain-135 grain .308 projectiles from a 16" barrel in attempt to address the velocity deficit that result from the heavier 168-175 grain projectiles.

Ideally, I would like to see Hornady produce a 135 grain AMAX and/or BTHP for the .308 so you could enjoy increased velocity in a 16" barrel, better ballistic coefficients, and excellent terminal results.

15 posted on 04/23/2017 4:29:03 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson