Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘I Don’t Make Movies for Rich Liberal Elites’ - De Niro Defends Fed Arts Spending
MRC TV ^ | May 9, 2017 | Mark Judge

Posted on 05/09/2017 8:11:55 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sounds like Robert would like to take in a few Syrians.


21 posted on 05/09/2017 9:23:15 PM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I must haved missed the part about “reciting lines written by someone else”, in Art History class.


22 posted on 05/09/2017 9:27:27 PM PDT by mindburglar (When Superman and Batman fight, the only winner is crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Shove it up your 0bama, Bob!


23 posted on 05/09/2017 9:48:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (Make up my mind, NBC,CBS,CNN,ABC. What are the "facts" today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"I don't make movies for rich liberal elites,” De Niro said at the event, which took place at Lincoln Center's David H. Koch Theatre. “We make movies to entertain audiences. Audiences vote by seeing them

Yes, they do. And when was the last time audiences turned out to see a Robert DeNiro film? Credit where it's due, DeNiro was excellent in "Godfather II" and "Mean Streets", and incandescent in "Taxi Driver" and "Raging Bull" - but that was decades ago. These days he's a has-been who tried and failed to be a comedic actor and now makes headlines by blathering about Trump.
24 posted on 05/09/2017 9:52:09 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Nobody gave Chaplin government funds to make films. He made films, people paid to watch them and then he made money, not the reverse... The government handing out taxpayers money to ‘artist’ who make films that people don’t watch.


25 posted on 05/09/2017 11:51:21 PM PDT by jerod (Socialism=Governance by Government - The National Socialist German Workers' Party is a good example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Yep.


26 posted on 05/10/2017 12:43:55 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

After his behavior in Trump’s election, I have written this man off. I won’t watch a single movie that has him in the cast. He is a typical anti-American lefty Hollyweird jackass.


27 posted on 05/10/2017 1:05:31 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Chaplin wasn’t from a Muslim country, if those groups are so great let Hollywierd fund it.


28 posted on 05/10/2017 3:49:36 AM PDT by stockpirate (There is a coup in progress, catch them, try them, HANG THEM ALL TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Maybe not but they love getting on the Big Government handout train.


29 posted on 05/10/2017 4:14:33 AM PDT by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If (for some strange reason) there were not another movie made, another song written and not another painting painted, the world would be just fine.

We have an entire catalogue of entertainment/culture to choose from by people who were actually proficient at their craft.


30 posted on 05/10/2017 4:40:03 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Torahman

What’s more, Robert De Niro is REALLY full of Bullstalin.

Charlie Chaplin and other successful stars and starlets bucked the studio system and founded United Artists with their own wealth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Artists

United Artists (UA) is an American film and television entertainment studio. The studio was founded in 1919 by D. W. Griffith, Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, and Douglas Fairbanks with the intention of controlling their own interests rather than depending upon commercial studios.[1] The studio was repeatedly bought, sold and restructured over the ensuing century. The current United Artists is an in-name-only successor to the original company, which was acquired by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in 1981.[2]


31 posted on 05/10/2017 4:59:35 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (patriots win, Communists and Socialist Just-Us Warriors lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

So he does not make movies for himself?
He is 1% of the 1%


32 posted on 05/10/2017 11:28:35 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson