True but this case does show what is wrong with the priorities that drive our immigration policies.
This is the kind of immigrant we should have. Someone who brings talents, skills and drive to succeed to our country.
This is a man from an English-speaking country that shares our Anglo-Saxons values. He is someone that can easily assimilate in to the American society.
But no our immigration priorities are to bring in to the country immigrants that do not speak English, do not come from European countries that have traditions of freedom, to bring people can not easily assimilate and to bring people that do not have useful skills.
What kind of logic drives our immigration policy? You get one guess.
How about illegal means illegal? To give any race preference in deportations would be seen, rightly, as racist. He should’ve immigrated here the right way. I have absolutely no sympathy for him.
A criminal from a country that supported terrorism?
With all those points you cite, why did he not do things the right, legal way?
If they did share those values, they would be leaving the EU along with the UK. Nowadays, they have a homosexual prime minister though, among other abominations, though they haven’t yet legalized abortion (but that is probably on the way now too).
This is a man from an English-speaking country that shares our Anglo-Saxons values …
Ask Ted Kennedy.
“This is the kind of immigrant we should have”
He wasn’t an immigrant, he was an illegal alien
“He is someone that can easily assimilate in to the American society.”
He couldn’t easily assimilate and he didn’t bother for more than a decade try to do the first right thing in coming here to live, which is become a citizen.
You can’t build a house on sand and expect it to stand long - He built himself a bad foundation in our country, just as all other illegals do. What they do after they are illegally in our country is not a game changer to the fact they are illegally here.