Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
If requested, the officer may take possession of the weapon, for safety reasons, until the contact is complete.

Under what thought process is this right? How does a cop get to simply disarm a citizen when there is no crime being committed?

9 posted on 07/26/2017 3:29:49 PM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: raybbr

The Supreme Court made a ruling on this exact subject.

They wrote that an officer may disarm suspects during a “Terry Stop”.

There has to be some reasonably articulable suspicion of a crime.

A traffic stop is not supposed to even happen unless the officer can articulate a reasonable suspicion of a law being broken.


10 posted on 07/26/2017 3:40:29 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson