Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward

“Perhaps you could add a link to the case you are talking about.”

I tried unsuccessfully to make this link work yesterday, in HTML - but it seems to work if I just avoid HTML altogether and allow FR to create the link:

http://www.cardozolawreview.com/content/denovo/Sullivan.37.symposium.pdf


13 posted on 02/21/2018 10:59:44 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
“Noting that, “[i]t should go without saying that neither Judge Sullivan, nor any District Judge, should have to order the Government to comply with its constitutional obligations, let alone that he should feel compelled to craft such an order with a view toward a criminal contempt prosecution, anticipating its willful violation,” Mr. Schuelke nevertheless recommended that, without disobedience of a “clear and unequivocal” order, the prosecutors not be charged with criminal contempt.”

Nonsense. Was this investigator named Comey ? This mealymouthed rationale sounds eerily similar to his excuse for not charging Clinton.

14 posted on 02/21/2018 12:26:08 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson