Judge Nap thinks these are better than sworn testimony of 6 witnesses, besides Trump was mean to McCabe.
But he's full of sh*t if he thinks somebody's own notes, not certified by anybody, are better than court witnesses.
When did he write them? During the meeting, afterwards or when he knew he was going to get fired? Did he follow this practice with every meeting he had? If not, why do this with just Trump? Why would his recollections after the fact be any more accurate than Trump's?
Lots of issues with these notes being used as evidence of anything other than what this guy had on his mind at the time.
Unless these "notes" were witnessed by someone else in the meeting, and they signed as such, these are just pieces of paper that anybody could have written anytime about anything they wanted.
I can just see it in court, "Hey judge, I wrote a note accusing my boss of some crimes. Would that be enough to get him fired?