I’m guessing she doesn’t have anything but we’ll see. It doesn’t matter what Tucker or anyone else says, if she has the goods, then she will produce them.
Going on the show to make a case would have been a good idea (if she has something). She could legitimately say she won’t give details, but at least repeat her statements to a wide audience to get support. The fact that she wouldn’t go on does strike me as suspicious.
Sure, lawyers don’t give details. But they usually work the media for their client’s behalf. And her claim was something like 8 million votes changed, right? It doesn’t seem likely the cheating would be on that scale.
“Going on the show to make a case would have been a good idea (if she has something)”
Gotta disagree with that. All going on tv an making a case would do would allow the nefarious media the opportunity to undermine it all before it goes to trial. They addressed that very thing in the press conference the other day. Did you not see it? They stated they will make the case in court of law not the court of public opinion.
The media is under the illusion the evidence has to be vetted through them. They are wrong and their collective ego is sickening....tucker Carlson included.
So, this woman who is a Christian and a very successful attorney is going to go out on a limb, destroy her Christian testimony with outrageous lies, trash here own credibility and entire career as an attorney for some cock-eyed conspiracy theory concocted by some conspiracy fruitcake, that she has no evidence whatsoever for? Hmmm, makes a lot of sense to me.
Are you kidding? She was so enraged at what she and the others have uncovered she came close to losing it at the press conference on Thursday.
Powell is an excellent lawyer and well-reknowned. Why would she stake her reputation on a lie when she has the biggest stage she has ever had?
To do that would not be rational, and if Sidney is one thing, she is rational.
The media are masters at framing the conversation. They have already framed this one by planting the seeds of doubt in even minds of people even on this forum. However, if she had been a good little lawyer and said nothing, they would have already won in the court of opinion and the issue would have already gone away. She was (as was Guliani) between a rock and a hard place. If they revealed too much, they kill their case. If they revealed too little. The case was already lost. We are up against a cunning enemy in the media and Deep State.
“Going on the show to make a case would have been a good idea (if she has something). She could legitimately say she won’t give details, but at least repeat her statements to a wide audience to get support. The fact that she wouldn’t go on does strike me as suspicious.”
Tell me about it - we’ve heard far too many ‘tick tocks’ to simply believe people, even if they appear to be on our side.
In her case, she doesn’t have to lay out an entire legal strategy on Tucker or anywhere else, but she can at least give some broad outlines of what’s coming...assuming anything is coming.
Going on a hostile pundits tv show, presenting the truth and then have them shred the proof on the editing floor only to mock you could destroy your case in the court of public opinion.
Tucker showed his hostility prior to the interview, and after by his lying slanderfest that night. Tucker does not care about the USA he cares about his ratings. This has become obvious.
He could have actually done us a great service, he chose to try and take down Sidney for a feather in his cap instead.
How childish.
17 million, not 8.