What’s Going On? Arizona Recently Processed 673,000 Voter Identities with the Social Security Administration – 58% Had NO MATCH FOUND

GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 9/19/2021 | Jim Hoft

[bitt]

In the last 10 weeks, Arizona has checked the voter registration credentials with the Social Security Administration (SSA) on 673,560 applicants.

This is a massive volume considering most States including Arizona typically process around 2,500 a month. They’ve processed more identities in the last 2 months than they’ve done in the last 9 years combined. Is someone scrubbing a database, or auditing “Federal Only” voters?

During “new voter registration” States are to verify the driver’s license number against their own MVD database. Only in situations where no driver’s license can be provided should the State check their identity through the Help America Vote Verification (HAVV) interface provided by the SSA. The 43 States that participate provide the last 4 of the SS#, the applicant’s name, and DOB. The interface responds if a match was, or was not found, if they are deceased, and so on. This entire HAVV Excel dataset can be downloaded here from the SSA.

“No Match” was found on 58% of the voters submitted by Arizona over the last 10 weeks.

[dadfly]

very interesting...

[GOPJ]

They cheated everywhere, not just Arizona. And, they have been cheating for years.

Sure looks that way... I wish a 'member of the press' would ask Pelosi and Schumer to condemn voter fraud... They never had a problem demanding Trump to 'disavow' everything 50 times...

[Norseman]

>>Arizona appears to have many more non-matches than other states. Do you think we are just worse spellers?<<

I wasn’t aware that AZ has many more non-matches, but I did notice that the same pattern of a lot of non-matches extends back several months/years in AZ. So why hasn’t anyone taken a sample from, say, a year ago and followed up to see what the reasons are for all the mismatching?

It’s possible that all sorts of illegal aliens are being registered to vote in AZ, of course, and that their SS information is faked. It might even be probable if AZ registers people at the same time they get their drivers’ licenses. But usually when numbers like this come out, there’s an innocent explanation. Isn’t it worth checking out that possibility before automatically assuming the worst?

[Norseman]

After looking at the database, a lot of states have high numbers of non-matches. Arizona appears to have been using the database excessively lately, as the article indicates. A non-match would occur if a voter married or moved, and not just recently.

People tend to update their info at Social Security faster than they worry about updating their voter registration, especially if they only bother to vote every four years or so. The failure to update a change of address would generate a non-match, and a lot of them if AZ was sending large batches for verification for some reason, as it appears they were doing.

It would make far more sense to just set up the system with all nine digits of a SS# and submit that to poll watchers on election day, then check the SS info against the voter’s ID. The database could even be updated immediately to show that SS# had been voted and in which precinct, so that the same voter couldn’t vote in his home state and his vacation state.

In a way, it’s encouraging that this database is already up and running. It should now be trivial to expand its use to cover election day identifications.

[Norseman]

It looks to me like someone in AZ is using the database in a way it was not intended to be used, and is just running the names of all registered voters through the system regardless whether they have a driver’s license on file. This would be a way to uncover voters who have their actual info on their driver’s license, but are using a fake social security number because they’re illegal aliens.

As I pointed out elsewhere though, a lot of the mismatches could be due to people moving or marrying and only updating their SS info and not their voter registration info.

[WhattheDickens?]

ping