I asked ChatGPT: Why do people wear Che Guevara t-shirts?

Wordpress ^ | February 26, 2023 | Daniel Alman (aka Dan from Squirrel Hill)

[Falconspeed]

Wow. Reading 10% of the article was exhausting, like reading high school term papers. “It is important to...” Yeah, whatever. Chatgbt is a slick used car salesman. “Some people think that Ford Pinto’s had issues. But NASCAR drove Pinto’s for many years and more Pinto’s were sold in 1978 than F150 trucks.” Oh. And Che was demonic. Proof: he thoroughly enjoyed the seven deadly sins.

[Myrddin]

That was a greater waste of time that re-runs of the great British cooking show. I'm less impressed with ChatGPT on every exposure.

[Chode]

never gets old...

[alexander_busek]

After Che and his revolution, there was net immigration out of the country.

Also known as "emigration."

Regards,

[motor_racer]

I’d like to see a similar conversation beginning with “Why do people wear MAGA hats?”

A comparison of responses to the two questions should reveal much about ChatGPT.

[P.O.E.]

Thanks for that.

Interesting to see the verbal gymnastics the chatbot goes through to evade the question. It would repeat itself as if it was stuck on the one answer, just with more verbiage when cornered.

[Mr. K]

Wow... That was actually a pretty remarkable conversation.

[Mr. K]

Ask it who killed Vince Foster next.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

A hero? He personally executed many people without a trial. He was a serial killer.

Spot on. Celebrating a cold-blooded killer. Now, THAT is genius.

[military cop]

ChatGPT:

“It is important to acknowledge ...” -——> BS FOLLOWS

Sounds like any conversation I’ve ever had with a liberal.

[HartleyMBaldwin]

I have to admit I didn’t read through the whole tiresome exchange, but the similarity to conversations with liberals was definitely noticeable. If you call them on something, they’ll make some vaguely conciliatory remark and then go right back to their talking points, as if restating an unsupported assertion somehow makes it become true. Or they’ll evade the question via digression.

The OP has far more patience than I.

[grundle]

ChatGPT’s political filters are kicking in when you see it “run home to mama”. By that, it will hide behind statements like it’s complex, some experts say, and the like. The political filter always stops it from answering straightforward questions the filter does not like and the programming runs and hides.

That is an excellent observation.

[grundle]

You are right. The correct words is emigration. Thanks for the correction and lesson.

[grundle]

Wow... That was actually a pretty remarkable conversation.

Yes. It talks just like a human communist.

[grundle]

Thanks for your praise in post 49.

[Yardstick]

I agree it’s extremely impressive. Makes me think the prediction that AI will be able to perform some white collar type work isn’t too far fetched.

[Nachoman]

This exchange reminds me of the Monty Python “Arguments” skit.

[TChad]

I agree it’s extremely impressive.

We're now well past Turing tests. ChatGPT is intelligent, and often wrong. Just like people.

[Yardstick]

Yep, I was pretty blown away by some AI generated art the other day. This stuff is no joke.

[TChad]

This stuff is no joke.

No joke, indeed. Here's a Chat-GPT-brained robot:

https://twitter.com/TansuYegen/status/1629151585157742595