Wrong. Thats not what you always get.
I’ve always seen that its not about where a parent was born but whether or not both parents are US Citizens at time child was born.
Child who may be future President shouldn’t have any allegiance to country or people other than the USA.
Obama himself gave various info about his birth and parents and clearly didnt have sole allegiance to the USA. Just because he was pushed upon the country and held office for 2 terms doesnt mean you throw out what the founders thought was important. Obama shows us its ALL the more important to keep solid guidelines going forward.
So are we saying Vivek has allegience to India? He’s not a citizen of India.
Are we saying Rubio and Cruz have allegiance to Cuba? Neither are Cuban citizens.
Actually, what the founders thought was crap. Especially that 3/5 person nonsense. And as to NBC, they couldn't have been more unclear and vague. The 14th Amendment tried (and failed) to clarify citizenship.
So it's been up to the courts to determine who is eligible. And only a moron believes Kamala, Nikki, Vivek, etc. are ineligible. Only a moron believes Obammy really wasn't president.
Exactly. Had we stuck to the founder’s criterion we would have dodged a bullet to the guts.