No, I was hoping for Bush to use SO many openings regarding the WOT to make a more forceful point. What I saw, was platitudes and soundbites. Look, I've known from 2000 that President Bush is not a great orator, but he's had almost 4 years to refine his "talking points" and they were simply weak.
However, knowing that a strong manager is not always the best PR voice for an organization, I will continue to support him against our WOT.
Mighty nice of you :')
Which is exactly what wins the debate in the days following the actual event. Check history. 2000 certainly bore this out.
BTW, that's what is called "being on message," so essential to modern campaigns that get played out in the media.