Try looking at the responses he got that are so typical for anyone who doesn't go with the flow. No rebuttal of any of his specifics, just slams as a DU troll.
Alternate views and opinions need to be voiced.
Beeing a cheering chorus of 'yes men' doesn't help anyone.
Neither does being a "naysayer," particularly when some of his premises are demonstrably false. Opinions are great, but they should be supportable and based on conclusions which square with current facts and trackable history. That's not too much to ask, is it?