Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: snowsislander

When you say "what would happen is that the very same courts would say she had due process in the umpteen hearings we would have and issue a finding saying her civil rights have not been violated or something to that effect" Your missing the point --

Please read The statute at the top; ch940.01, 1 is executed by by executive order filed with the Secretary of State -- NOT the court -- No court review.


57 posted on 03/26/2005 1:51:13 PM PST by Harry Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Harry Jones; MikeinIraq
When you say "what would happen is that the very same courts would say she had due process in the umpteen hearings we would have and issue a finding saying her civil rights have not been violated or something to that effect" Your missing the point --

Please read The statute at the top; ch940.01, 1 is executed by by executive order filed with the Secretary of State -- NOT the court -- No court review.

Sorry, but you are quoting MikeinIraq, not me.

I am aware of the process involved. I was the one who suggested treating the clemency as relating to restoration of a civil right to life, which MikeinIraq responded to with the above quote.

58 posted on 03/26/2005 3:44:32 PM PST by snowsislander (Isa41:17-When the poor and needy seek water,and there is none,and their tongue faileth for thirst...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson