You say: And so I ask just what is the 'rule of law' in this particular case of Terry Schiavo...what is the legal precendent to starve a woman to death who has NOT BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME.... there is none. Not in our legal system that I am aware of. So perhaps the 'rule of law' at its most basic level is NOT being followed here.
Why can't Bush have his police arrest all persons interfearing with her parents giving Terri food and water by non-extrordinary means (ice chips) and instruct the AG to present them up for Jury trial on charges of conspirasy to murder in the 1st degree. This would include Sherriffs, local cops, lawyers and judges.
There is no constitutional legisllation demanding starvation by nonextrordinary means.
Today is the day all partys are to be before a Congressional Committee.. (Including Terri) Are they there or not?? Is the Rule of Law being really followed or not???
Are the US Marshalls going to enforce a Congressional Suppeana??