Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lazamataz's Opus: No longer a Republican (Vanity)
Now | Me

Posted on 04/26/2005 7:27:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz

Well, they went and did it.

The Republicans look like they will wimp out, not exercise the so-called Nuclear Option, and Harry Reid will PERMIT two judges to be approved and disapprove four others. Does anyone think for a second the Democrats won't "go nuclear" in a heartbeat if the roles were reversed?

This seals the deal for me. I am a Republican no more. It seems it does not matter if I vote Republican anyways, all I get is more liberalism. I am a man without a political party. I am a conservative without a home.

Between Bushes enthusiastic embrace of illegal immigration, and our party's inability to get even moderately conservative judges approved, what's the freakin' point of voting Republican any more? What's the point of voting? I will get liberalism no matter how I vote. My main issue is guns, and it appears the Democrats have learned their lesson on that one, so it appears I will be safe on the firearms front. Everything else the Republicans stand for, they stand for in word only. They do not seem to want to act. Therefore, I do not seem to want to vote Republican any more.

This is my Opus -- not from Free Republic, but from the Republican party. Even when they have the majority, they surrender.

The Republican Party is the France of politics.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2016toldyouso; allyouropibelongtous; broadbrushanalysis; bushamnesty; bushdoctrineunfold; complaintothemnotus; cowboyup; crybaby; damnfrench; dempropaganda; dontgo; drywall; footinmouth; gimmeedrugs; gullibility; gwbnecktie; gypsumsniffer; hooray; ifeelbetteralready; jerk; lazlazlaz; libertarians; lifeaintthatsimple; majorjerk; memelookatme; metoo; oops; opus; republicansarewimps; rideemcowboy; righton; rightonthemoney; rinossux; rinowatch; spoketoosoon; typicallaz; woooohoooyoutellem; yetanotheropus; youtellem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860861-867 next last
To: Larry Lucido; jjbrouwer
Please direct all your bumps to jjbrouwer.

He hates that.

jj: BTTT

841 posted on 05/16/2005 9:06:52 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


842 posted on 05/16/2005 10:10:11 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


843 posted on 05/16/2005 10:45:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Hi Larry. I don't "hate it" as the other Larry claims. However, it is a bit boring answering his irrelevant flags. It's like the bore in the bar who keeps telling the same crap joke in the hope you will finally laugh. I guess it keeps him off the streets though.


844 posted on 05/16/2005 12:17:38 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Chelsea - kings of England!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


845 posted on 05/16/2005 1:21:47 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


846 posted on 05/16/2005 2:23:15 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


847 posted on 05/16/2005 3:59:05 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


848 posted on 05/17/2005 7:22:57 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

BTTT


849 posted on 05/17/2005 7:32:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
No idea why your Opus came up on a "Chinese Drywall" search. But it's kind of funny.
850 posted on 10/16/2009 7:08:26 PM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

If you haven’t snorted a line of Chinese drywall, you haven’t lived.


851 posted on 10/17/2009 12:46:55 PM PDT by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

What lol


852 posted on 10/17/2009 12:50:39 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: Columbine
Why wait for facts? Just run on out the door and join the Democrats. Hillary's waiting for you.

Well, don't YOU feel silly, EIGHT YEARS later, when it is the *Republicans* who pretty much joined the Democrats... and the *Democrats* invoked the Nuclear Option the Republicans shied from. :)

853 posted on 12/29/2013 4:35:50 PM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer

You’ve been gone a long time. Wonder whatever happened to you?


854 posted on 12/29/2013 4:37:58 PM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Wow.

How prescient I was.

855 posted on 12/15/2014 4:16:55 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

And how.


856 posted on 12/15/2014 4:43:05 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I left about six years ago. Changed to independent. Done with the system as it sits.


857 posted on 12/15/2014 4:45:28 PM PST by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Even when they have the majority, they surrender

After watching the Republicans operate over a period of time, what led you to believe that the Republicans would not surrender at the first opportunity? The Senate could be 99 Republicans and one Democrat and the Democrat would still call the shots. The House could be 434 Republicans and 1 Democrat and the Democrat would still be in charge.

858 posted on 12/15/2014 4:51:42 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport
After watching the Republicans operate over a period of time, what led you to believe that the Republicans would not surrender at the first opportunity? The Senate could be 99 Republicans and one Democrat and the Democrat would still call the shots. The House could be 434 Republicans and 1 Democrat and the Democrat would still be in charge.

Untrue.

Those numbers should be 100 and 435 Republicans, and the Democrats would STILL call the shots.

That's because Republicans ARE Democrats.

859 posted on 12/15/2014 4:53:38 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I will go with your assessment.


860 posted on 12/15/2014 4:58:16 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860861-867 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson