Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Private Property Rights in the USA 7/4/1776 - 6/23/2005
My Dark and Foreboding Mind ^ | 6/23/2005 | Self

Posted on 06/23/2005 8:37:19 AM PDT by Red Badger

The SCOTUS today pulled the feeding tube of the American Private Property Rights. In so doing, these 5 justices have finally confirmed the total and unconditional power of the government over the people. Washington, Jefferson, Adams and Franklin are turning over in their graves...........


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dead; privateproperty; rights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Red Badger
The Constitution is just Judicial toilet paper and Congress and the White House are complaisant in this. If they do nothing they share the blame. Possible responses:

1. Impeachment (fat chance too many fat cat repugnats and corrupt demoncrats are all for this despite the rhetoric)

2. Cut the courts budgets (only needs 50+ votes and it is done)

3. Censor the court or hold hearings. (Drag them through the mud sunrise to sunset seven days a week four weeks a month until they scream like a little girl.)

4. Redraw districts and eliminate the troublesome sections (the 9th circuit court of appeals would be a good start, they may not be part of the problem this time but what the heck it is time to let them know we are done with them)
41 posted on 06/23/2005 2:25:33 PM PDT by Mark in the Old South (Sister Lucia of Fatima pray for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Apologies for acting as spelling police, but it's urgently important that all of us be prepared to go out and educate the public about this awesomely important issue that isn't even on most people's radar screens, and to come across in a way that doesn't open us up to any criticism or ridicule.

The term is "eminent" (not "imminent") domain. Both are real words, but they mean two different things. However, the term "imminent" does have plenty of applicability when discussing this eminent domain decision, as in "The end of our Constitutional republic seem imminent". No wonder you got confused . . .

Main Entry: em·i·nent
Pronunciation: 'e-m&-n&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin eminent-, eminens, present participle of eminEre to stand out, from e- + -minEre; akin to Latin mont-, mons mountain -- more at MOUNT
1 : standing out so as to be readily perceived or noted : CONSPICUOUS
2 : jutting out : PROJECTING
3 : exhibiting eminence especially in standing above others in some quality or position : PROMINENT

Main Entry: eminent domain
Function: noun
: a right of a government to take private property for public use by virtue of the superior dominion of the sovereign power over all lands within its jurisdiction

Main Entry: im·mi·nent
Pronunciation: 'i-m&-n&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin imminent-, imminens, present
participle of imminEre to project, threaten, from in- + -minEre (akin to Latin mont-, mons mountain) -- more at MOUNT
: ready to take place; especially : hanging threateningly over one's head "was in imminent danger of being run over"
- im·mi·nent·ly adverb

42 posted on 06/23/2005 7:55:15 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If ever there was a time to say "From my cold dead hands" and really mean it, this is it.

One of these abominations is going on in my township. I wish the affected owners had the guts to put out a public call for the militia. They might be very surprised at who shows up to defend their property from the tyrannical government. I really don't think I could live with myself if I didn't answer such a call.


43 posted on 06/23/2005 8:03:44 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

The choice of spelling was intentional.........


44 posted on 06/24/2005 5:10:05 AM PDT by Red Badger (The Army makes the world safe for democracy. The Marines make the world safe for the Army.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Re: "They bit off more than they could chew. This can be a major issue in 2008: property rights."

You mean like Roe v Wade was in 1973. Funny I seem to recall much the same kind of talk then. I also notice these kinds of things happen most often when a Repugnat is in the WH. GWB will do nothing just as Nixon did nothing. When the courts found out they could kill babies and the nation only fussed they knew they could do anything they pleased. And they will.
45 posted on 06/24/2005 1:37:08 PM PDT by Mark in the Old South (Sister Lucia of Fatima pray for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mark in the Old South

You nailed it.


46 posted on 06/25/2005 3:46:46 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<< Ad Campaign for Durbin the Turbin in profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mark in the Old South

If people aren't willing to defend their nation's innocent babies, then the people aren't ready to challenge tyranny in any way, shape, or form. We must get back to the basics.


47 posted on 06/25/2005 3:48:13 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<< Ad Campaign for Durbin the Turbin in profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson