Most of the posts above are hysterical ad hominem attacks, based on the assumption that anyone asking about this would be from the Dark Side.
It's funny that people who cannot write good English also make up definitions for "paleo." Try - ancient, as opposed to neo, for new.
I think Rush Limbaugh is pretty good. I often listen to him. He definitely saved AM radio and paved the way for many other conservative hosts. He is usually right about the issues. Obviously there is a multi-pronged effort to get at him and others.
The site in question poses as a parody site but is not that at all. The best way to refute false claims is with the facts.
What if he is gay? Does it affect the veracity of his work?
If he is gay, he certainly is not a flaming homo and perahps he has made efforts to normalize.
I am not sure the downside is that bad - there is after all the Log Cabin Repubs.
But I still think that Rush is great. And I doubt these rumors are true - if he has marital problems, it is probably due to living in airports and the not insignificant drug problem.