The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,...snip, snip
After being required to have a National ID, what's next? The National ID will be similar to our new military id's that have a chip on them. What is on those chips? I can't even get on my computer at work without inserting my id (CAC) into my keyboard's card reader. They limit structures you can enter, and keep track of you medical history. You cannot buy anthing or rent anything on base without this ID.
Imagine the same thing on a civilian level. They won't tell people they cannot buy commercial goods without their ID. They will tell businesses that they cannot sale to those without ID's.
As I have posted thru example earlier and ID is very much a part of being secure. Refressher of that example: Duke student accused of rape where his ID thru ATM card and camera showed him not to be where his accuser said he was...and thus he could not have done what he was accused of.
AGAIN, the ID itself and how it is used are two very different things.
I do not oppose prosecuting abuses, in fact I offer that proper ID facilitates prosecution of such things.
Why don't you refuse the ID you have at work? You do have that right correct?